Discover the exceptional features of the 에볼루션파워볼 site.

Discover the Features of the 에볼루션파워볼 Site

If you’re a gaming aficionado, you’ve probably heard about the world-renowned site. But do you know what makes it unique? What are the features that set it apart? Keep reading as we delve into smoother feeds, stellar graphics, impeccable odds, and other phenomenal attributes of the site.

Cutting-edge Live Broadcasts

First off, the site is reputed for its unparalleled live feeds. Gone are the days when time lags and glitches were the major put-offs in online gaming. Say hello to real-time feeds, with the action unfolding right before your eyes. Plus, the HD graphics contribute to a thrilling gaming experience.

Diversity of Games

Who says variety can’t be the spice of gaming? Certainly not the creators of . Despite its name, powerball isn’t the only game on offer here; there’s a cornucopia of other games, too. From blackjack to roulette, there’s a game for everyone.

Impeccable Odds

What’s a betting site without favorable odds? The site ensures you get the upper hand by offering odds that are among the top in the industry. It’s not just about playing; it’s about winning as well!

Easy and Secure Transactions

Payment processes at are seamless. The site accepts various modes of payments, ensuring convenience for all players. Also, it employs advanced security measures, so your personal and financial details are safe.

Exceptional Customer Support

No matter how good a platform is, customers will always have queries. ensures swift and effective responses through their 24/7 customer support. Now, that’s service at its best!

Now, let’s summarize everything in a nutshell. is an exceptional platform where you can enjoy a diversity of games, live broadcasts, favorable odds, secure transactions, and impeccable customer service. Get ready to explore this gaming haven!

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the 에볼루션파워볼 site Secure?

Absolutely! The site uses advanced security measures for maximum customer protection.

Are there various games on 에볼루션파워볼?

Yes, the gaming variety on the site is extensive.

How are the Customer Support services at 에볼루션파워볼?

Customer care services at are excellent, with 24/7 availability.

Are the transactions at 에볼루션파워볼 smooth?

Indeed! The site ensures seamless and safe transactions.

What distinguishes 에볼루션파워볼?

Its real-time feeds, gaming variety, incredible odds, secure transactions, and exceptional customer service make 에볼루션파워볼 stand out.…

Incompatibility with human rights

Should There Be a Death Penalty?

There is a growing consensus that the death penalty is incompatible with human rights. It is used for drug-related offences, terrorism charges and murder in some countries. Many people have spent years on death row despite being probably innocent, due to false eyewitnesses, jail house snitches and junk science.

Moral arguments focus on procedural issues, such as decisions about arrest; what charges to file; the use of defenses like insanity; and sentencing, including jury selection; and post-conviction appeals.

It is a form of punishment

The death penalty is a government-sanctioned killing of an offender convicted of a crime. It can be imposed for crimes including murder, terrorism-related acts and other serious offenses. It is also used for a wide variety of drug-related crimes and some political offences. People who are convicted of a capital offence can spend years on “death row” waiting for their execution. In some countries, they are executed even though they have been found innocent. This is an unjust practice that should be banned.

Across the United States, there is a significant divide over the death penalty. Support for it varies by party, education and race and ethnicity. For example, Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more likely than Democrats and Democratic leaners to support the death penalty. In addition, Americans with less education are more likely to support it than those with higher educational levels. In the past decade, several Supreme Court rulings have limited the death penalty’s scope. They include Atkins v. Virginia (2002; ruled the death penalty is unconstitutional for those with intellectual disabilities) and Roper v. Simmons (2005; ruled it is unconstitutional to execute those who were under the age of 18 when the crime was committed).

It is a form of deterrence

The death penalty is often defended as a way of deterring crime. However, this argument is unfounded and the evidence shows that it does not deter murder or other serious crimes any more than life imprisonment. Moreover, the risks of executing an innocent person are significant. In the United States, over 191 people have been wrongfully executed since 1973.

The claim that the death penalty is a deterrent rests on two flawed assumptions: 1) that criminals behave rationally and 2) that the criminal justice system is fail-safe. The truth is that the criminal justice system is a human institution that can be biased against certain groups. For example, prosecutors tend to seek the death penalty less frequently in cases involving racial minorities.

Moreover, a study by UCLA professor Richard Berk found that most studies claiming that capital punishment deters murder are based on faulty data. He re-examined the available data and found that claims of deterrence are mostly a result of a statistical artifact caused by states executing very few people in some years.

It is a form of justice

The death penalty is a form of justice, which may deter violent crime. However, opponents of capital punishment argue that it is not only unjust but also wastes society’s resources. They argue that the costs of executions are three times those of life imprisonment. Furthermore, the death penalty is disproportionately imposed on poor people and racial minorities. They are also more likely to have been wrongfully convicted. They have fewer opportunities to challenge their case or access legal representation.

The death penalty is widely opposed by a majority of U.S. adults, including those who identify as Republicans and Republican leaners (77% vs. 47%) and those with less education (68%) compared to those with some college or a bachelor’s degree (49%). Moreover, many states have abolished the death penalty in recent years. These include New Mexico (2009), Illinois (2011), Connecticut (2012), Maryland (2013), and Delaware (2016). The second optional protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights also prohibits the death penalty.

It is a form of retribution

A retributivist approach to punishment seeks to deter future crime by punishing offenders. This approach, however, is flawed by the possibility that the state will execute an innocent person. In addition, the death penalty violates a basic principle of due process.

Retributivist defenders of the death penalty rely on the ancient legal principle lex talionis- “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life”- to justify capital punishment. They also distinguish retribution from vengeance, which is usually disproportionate to the offender’s misconduct and motivated by a petty desire for revenge.

Philosophers have debated the death penalty for centuries. Some philosophers argue that retribution rationalizes criminal behavior by treating criminals as rational agents, while others suggest that it fails to address underlying social conditions that contribute to crime. Others argue that the death penalty does not deter crime and should be replaced with a more restorative approach to punishment. Hard treatment, deprivations, and incarceration can all be considered vehicles for conveying messages to criminals about the community’s values.

Lead yourself back to the main page

Decline in Death Penalty Continues in 2022

Death Penalty in 2022

The death penalty continued to decline in 2022 as polls showed public support stayed near historic lows. In the USA, 18 people were executed while botched executions in Oklahoma, Alabama and Mississippi illustrated problems with prescribed protocols.

Meanwhile, six countries abolished the death penalty fully (Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea) or partially (Equatorial Guinea and Zambia). Executions in Iran, Saudi Arabia and Singapore increased dramatically for drug-related crimes.

United States

In 2022, US jurisdictions carried out 18 executions — the fewest in any year outside of 2020 and 2021, according to the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC). And five of this year’s botched executions (link is external) “significantly deviated from or illustrated problems with prescribed execution protocols,” DPIC’s year-end report finds.

States continued to struggle to get drugs for lethal injections, a major issue in recent years, as manufacturers balked at providing them. And some states, including Idaho, Florida and Mississippi, expanded laws granting secrecy around the administration of executions.

Despite the botched executions, overall, the use of the death penalty in the United States continued to decline this year as public support stayed near historic lows. Meanwhile, California, Oregon and Florida pushed ahead with their moratoriums on executions. Those moves bolster an end-goal of abolition, which aligns with dwindling public support for the penalty. This year, a handful of states that retained it also made progress by reviving abolition initiatives or reopening appeals for abolition-minded prisoners.


China remains the world’s leading executioner, but the country’s shadowy death penalty system leaves it difficult for Amnesty International to track cases. It is estimated that it executed at least 1,000 people in 2022, although the figure is likely to be much higher.

In China, executions for drug-related offences more than doubled in 2022 compared to the previous year and accounted for 37% of the global total recorded by Amnesty International. Executions of rich and powerful people convicted for economic crimes are also on the rise. In response, China enacted a law on legal aid in January 2022 that sets up a national system providing pro bono services for all citizens who are facing death penalties.

Amnesty International welcomes the move and urges other countries to follow suit. Nevertheless, the country is failing to respect international standards by imposing excessively harsh sentences and by delegating death penalty reviews to local courts, which lack procedural justice safeguards.

Middle East and North Africa

The Middle East and North Africa accounted for 94% of the world’s known executions in 2022, up 53% from last year. Iran and Saudi Arabia were responsible for the increase, with the latter “going on a killing spree”, according to Amnesty International.

Outside China, the highest number of executions in a single country came from three MENA states: Iran, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. In Iran, executions soared from 314 in 2021 to 576, while figures tripled in Saudi Arabia as the regime cracked down on protests.

Amnesty International continues to document due process violations in the region, including arbitrary arrest and detention, lack of adequate legal assistance, torture-tainted confessions and unfair trials. However, the region also saw an uptick in commutations or pardons. In addition, six countries in sub-Saharan Africa – Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Papua New Guinea – abolished the death penalty altogether in 2022. This is in line with the global trend away from the death penalty, which in 2022 saw a record number of countries vote for a resolution at the UN General Assembly calling for a moratorium on the use of capital punishment.


In Europe, the number of countries that executed people dropped significantly. Only a minority of 18 states, or 9% of all UN Member States, continued to carry out executions this year.

The death penalty is an inhuman and degrading punishment that violates human dignity. It does not serve as a deterrent to crime and is prone to judicial errors. We will not stop our work until all countries abolish it.

We welcome progress towards abolition in Kazakhstan, where the death penalty was abolished completely, and in Papua New Guinea, Sierra Leone and Equatorial Guinea, where it was largely abolished for ordinary crimes. However, the overall trend in the region is in the opposite direction, which seriously affects the chances of global abolition. This is despite some attention paid to this issue in intergovernmental fora and by some states. Moreover, there are continuing delays in addressing the death penalty for drug offences. This is a matter of urgency and needs to be addressed by all actors.

Learn more

The Controversial History and Practice of the Death Penalty in Texas

Texas and the Death Penalty

While most Texans say that they support the death penalty, a significant number believe that Texas has executed innocent people. This finding is especially strong among Blacks, other ethnic groups and younger respondents.

In the state of Texas, convicted death row inmates can appeal their sentence through the Board of Pardons and Paroles and the governor has the power to grant clemency.


From gripping courtroom dramas to heart-pounding moments of redemption, Texas’s history with capital punishment is a rollercoaster ride of emotions. It’s a story of wrongful convictions, botched executions and countless tales of innocence that defy belief.

From the start of the modern era of capital punishment in 1976 until 1998, Texas executed more people than any other state—and more than four times as many as Virginia, the second-highest executioner.

The state’s first execution using lethal injection was performed in 1982. Today, 184 inmates remain on Texas’ death row, including seven women. Although the death penalty is now at historic lows across the country, Texas still hands down and executes more death sentences than any other state—and it applies those sentences more disproportionately to racial minorities.


In Texas, as in most states, individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty. It’s the prosecutor’s job to show that someone committed a crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and it’s the defense attorney’s job to challenge evidence and raise any possible points of innocence.

In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that juries should be allowed to consider mitigating evidence when they decide whether a defendant should live or die. But juries are only given three limited questions, so they can’t truly take into account factors like mental retardation or child abuse.

When lawyers for a condemned prisoner exhaust all legal appeals, they can file a petition with the Board of Pardons and Paroles to recommend clemency. The governor has clemency authority but is not obligated to follow the board’s advice. If he or she grants clemency, the offender’s execution is delayed for 30 days. The board members are appointed by the governor. For more information about the judicial system in Texas, visit FindLaw’s Texas Law section.


The Texas criminal justice system allows for several avenues of appeal after a conviction and execution. Depending on the case, this can include filing a petition with the Board of Pardons and Paroles, the governor, or a one-time 120 day reprieve from an upcoming execution.

The prosecution can also choose not to seek the death penalty for a capital crime. This can be for a number of reasons including family members requesting that the death penalty not be sought, prosecutors believing they could not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, or evidence that the offender was under the age of 18 at the time of the offense (i.e. the victim was a child).

The use of DNA evidence is also becoming more common, though DNA testing has not proven innocence in any case. Nonetheless, many people who are convicted of a crime in Texas might not be there had mitigating factors such as mental illness or youth been considered.


Once a date for an execution is set, the prisoner’s legal team will file a series of final appeals. These are typically reviewed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Many of these cases also go to a federal district judge, who can grant a 30-day stay of the execution.

If no stays are granted, the execution is carried out. Usually, friends and family of the victim witness the process. Prison officials will allow media witnesses to view the execution, although they can not have direct contact or voice vocal prayers during the procedure.

Recently, TDCJ officials have released documents that show the department is woefully unprepared to execute an inmate. The documents reveal that the agency has trouble sourcing the drugs needed for the lethal injection. This may have contributed to the recent drop in executions. It is also believed that the lower number of executions could be related to better-trained indigent defense lawyers, and the ability to raise mitigating circumstances for an alleged killer’s crime.

Scroll back to the home page

The Death Penalty: A Controversial Form of Punishment

The Death Penalty

The death penalty is a form of punishment where the convict is executed for serious crimes. Some people support it because of the ‘eye for an eye’ philosophy. Others think it is cruel and unjust.

The death penalty is an affront to human rights and the right to life. It is also ineffective as a deterrent. Moreover, it has been proven that innocent people are executed.

It is a form of punishment

The death penalty is a form of punishment used by states to punish people who commit serious crimes, such as murder. It can be imposed by Congress or state legislatures. In the US, the death penalty was used frequently until the 1960s, when it became a target of moral, legal, and political opposition. Many scholars have found that the death penalty is inconsistently and unequally applied, and that racial and economic factors influence sentencing decisions.

In recent years, a growing number of states have abolished the death penalty, either through legislation or court rulings. These states include New Jersey (2007), New Mexico (2009), Colorado (2020), Washington (2018), and Delaware (2016). Many organizations are working to end the use of the death penalty, including the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and the Innocence Project, which provides free DNA testing to wrongfully convicted prisoners with the goal of winning their exoneration. Law enforcement professionals overwhelmingly agree that the death penalty does not deter crime. In fact, police chiefs rank the death penalty lowest among ways to reduce violent crime.

It is a deterrent

Despite the lack of a scientifically established deterrent effect, the death penalty continues to be used around the world. It is often used for crimes other than murder, such as drug offences. Nevertheless, people have strong intuitive feelings that the death penalty will deter murder.

Those who support the death penalty rely on the argument that other punishments, such as life without parole, do not provide sufficient deterrence. They also argue that it is an effective method of lowering the murder rate. But the truth is that many studies have found no such effects.

Ehrlich’s study was criticized by other researchers who experimented with different assumptions and time periods. Ultimately, they concluded that his results were not valid. Moreover, the imposition of the death penalty denies due process and is imposed disproportionately against victims who are white and offenders who are black, and against those who are poor. It is also irrevocable, denying a defendant the opportunity to benefit from new evidence or legal changes that could reduce his or her conviction and sentence.

It is a form of justice

In the United States, the death penalty is the punishment for murder and other crimes involving violence. A majority of Americans support it, though the numbers vary by racial and religious affiliation. Support for the death penalty is higher among white evangelical Protestants than other Protestants. Moreover, it is favored by Catholics and the religiously unaffiliated.

In recent years, several Supreme Court rulings have narrowed the scope of the death penalty. The Court ruled that the existing laws violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. The decision also affirmed the right of juries to choose whether or not a defendant is eligible for the death penalty.

Despite this, many people are wrongfully sentenced to death and spend years on death row. Several of these individuals have been found to be innocent, and 156 people have been released from death row in the United States since 1973. Innocent prisoners often have mental disabilities and have been subjected to unfair trials.

It is a form of retribution

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment or judicial murder, is the state-sanctioned killing of an offender as a punishment for a crime. It is a form of retribution that expresses society’s denunciation of the offender and its outrage at their conduct. However, it is difficult to justify capital punishment on utilitarian grounds alone, since executions are not merely retributive but can also express or communicate conflicting messages.

Several nonprofit organizations are working to abolish the death penalty, including the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and the Innocence Project, which helps to win exoneration for wrongfully convicted prisoners. In the United States, opinions about the death penalty vary by political affiliation, education level and race and ethnicity. Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more likely than Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents to support the death penalty for convicted murderers. In addition, people with less formal education are more likely to support the death penalty than those with at least a high school diploma.

Go Home

The Death Penalty: Constitutional, Arbitrary, Capricious, and Discriminatory

Death Penalty Overturned in California

In just the past 19 years, judges have reversed 34 death sentences in California. Most of those reversals occurred because of judicial errors such as giving improper instructions to jurors or allowing inadmissible evidence.

However, since the conservative majority on the court took office, it has refused to intervene in these cases. That’s a big problem.

The Death Penalty is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty infringes on the Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In Furman v. Georgia, the Court commutated the sentences of 629 people on death row.

Since then, the Court has allowed states to revive capital punishment so long as their laws provided an objective process for determining when it should be applied and enough discretion to ensure that it is not arbitrary or racially biased. The Court has also barred executions of certain groups, including children and people with mental illness or disability that prevents them from showing the level of culpability required for a death sentence.

Now, with a new conservative majority and a sped-up timetable for executions, the justices have closed the door to many petitions by death row prisoners seeking a review of their cases. This is a disturbing pattern, and it may signal that the court has stopped functioning as the “overseer of last resort” in matters of life or death.

The Death Penalty is Arbitrary

When the government decides who lives and dies for what amounts to the same crime, it is bound to make mistakes. That is why Furman declared that the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment. Unfortunately, four years later the Court shifted course in Gregg v. Georgia and other cases to revive the death penalty as a constitutionally permissible state power.

The Supreme Court’s shift to a hardline position is troubling. Its conservative majority shows hostility to any limits on capital punishment, and it has ignored claims of racial bias or errors that should have overturned federal death sentences such as those of Rejon Taylor.

The Supreme Court should use its power to ensure that no one is executed unless it meets the Constitution’s requirements. This means ensuring that the justices who make the decisions have the skills and resources to carry out this critical role. The justices need to be able to review evidence and consider the full details of each case. They should not simply rely on rote adherence to an outdated legal standard and ignore the arbitrary nature of the death penalty.

The Death Penalty is Capricious

In a single, one paragraph decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty violates the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. The Court centered its objections on the method of selection of which murders would receive the ultimate punishment, finding that the state’s procedures were so arbitrary and capricious that they violated the Constitution.

The Court cited the examples of an armed burglar who tripped and accidentally fired his gun killing the victim and a man who killed his fiancee’s son for a large monetary reward. The Court also pointed out that the statutory aggravating factors do not adequately explain how murders committed for monetary gain, or for other reasons, can be more deserving of the death penalty than those committed for any other reason.

But the court’s decision was a pyrrhic victory for opponents of the death penalty. The number of people who have been spared from execution since the Furman decision is still abysmally low – only 629 in all of America, and not even all those on death row.

The Death Penalty is Discriminatory

In reality, the death penalty is imposed disproportionately upon those whose victims are white, offenders who are people of color, and poor and powerless defendants – the very same defendants that studies show most likely do not benefit from the deterrent effect of capital punishment. It is also imposed upon those who are unlikely to be able to afford the best legal representation available, as well as those with mental health or substance abuse problems that limit their ability to participate in their own defense.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Furman v. Georgia, which overturned 629 death sentences nationwide, was the result of a successful strategy devised by TCADP Inc. Fund lawyers to challenge the justices’ own rules that allow capital-sentenced defendants to prove only that a particular actor or actors in their individual case committed an equal protection violation. This has enabled states to ignore racial disparities that are systematic in nature, such as the use of the “Texas Shuffle” and other racially biased jury selection practices to exclude or limit potential African American jurors.

Carry on to read more

Enter the Exciting World of 에볼루션파워볼 중계

Explore the World of 에볼루션파워볼 중계

Ever heard of 에볼루션파워볼 중계? If not, let me take you on a journey into this fascinating world. Full to the brim with exhilarating gaming experiences, this game captures the imagination of anyone who comes across it. What makes it even more captivating? The promise of massive jackpot prizes, unmatched thrill, and heart-racing excitement all bundled into an online gaming platform.

What is 에볼루션파워볼 중계?

Think of as an exhilarating online lottery game. It offers players a chance to scoop massive profits and delivers an unprecedented gaming thrill that has created quite a buzz in the online gaming world.

Why Choose 에볼루션파워볼 중계?

Why indeed? There are lots of reasons why has won enormous popularity. Its easy accessibility, incredible odds, and jackpot rolls are just the tip of the iceberg.

How to Play 에볼루션파워볼 중계

Playing couldn’t be simpler. It only requires a secure internet connection, a device, and a little bit of luck. You select numbers, place your wager, and hold your breath!

So you see, really does offer something for everyone. It’s thrilling, it’s potentially hugely rewarding, and it’s readily accessible to anyone, anywhere, at any time.


In the end, what counts is the thrill of the game – the anticipation as the numbers are drawn, the excitement of knowing that a jackpot could be just around the corner. That’s what 에볼루션파워볼 중계 is all about – giving gamers an experience that’s out of this world. So why not take a chance on 에볼루션파워볼 중계 and see where the game takes you?


1. Is 에볼루션파워볼 중계 Safe to Play?

Yes, it is. The platform uses leading-edge technology and safety regulations to ensure a secure gaming environment.

2. How can I win with 에볼루션파워볼 중계?

Winning is entirely based on luck. The numbers drawn are completely random, and every player has an equal chance of hitting the jackpot.

3. Can I play 에볼루션파워볼 중계 from outside Korea?

Yes, you can. As the game is online, you can play from anywhere in the world as long as you have internet access.

4. How big are the prizes in 에볼루션파워볼 중계?

The prizes can vary. However, 에볼루션파워볼 중계 is known for its generous jackpots. It’s always worth a play!

5. How can I start playing 에볼루션파워볼 중계?

You just need to create an account on the website, select your numbers, and hope for the best!…

Federal Jury Recommends Death Penalty for Pittsburgh Synagogue Attacker

The Same Federal Jury That Recommends Robert Bowers to Death For the Tree of Life Synagogue Attack Recommended Wednesday

The death penalty is expensive, and siphons off money that could be better spent fighting crime. It also limits due process and curtails appeals, the only means to correct serious miscarriages of justice.

Recidivism among convicted murderers does occur, but that is far less frequent than most people believe. The best way to prevent recidivism is through life without parole.

PITTSBURGH (CBS) — A judge formally imposed a death sentence on a man convicted of killing 11 people at a Pittsburgh synagogue.

The same jury that convicted Robert Bowers on all 63 federal charges last month recommended he be put to death for the attack that killed 11 people at Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life synagogue. Prosecutors said he exhibited the required level of intent and premeditation for a death penalty sentence. But defense attorneys argued that Bowers suffers from major mental illness, including schizophrenia, and therefore lacks the necessary intent.

As the judge read the verdict, relatives of the victims fought back tears and comforted each other. Bowers, 50, showed no reaction as the jurors affirmed their votes.

Rabbi Olshan described the federal trial as both difficult for families and a “necessary accounting.” She added that while no verdict can bring back the victims, it will help prevent the shooter from gaining notoriety and being an inspiration for others who share his antisemitic beliefs. The formal sentencing is set for Thursday and will include victims’ family members who are expected to speak publicly.

A federal jury in the trial of the Pittsburgh synagogue mass shooter has decided he is eligible for the death penalty.

The same federal jury that convicted Robert Bowers on 63 criminal counts recommended Wednesday that he be put to death for the deadliest antisemitic attack on U.S. soil. Bowers, 50, stormed the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh’s Squirrel Hill neighborhood on Oct. 27, 2018, killing 11 worshippers and wounding a dozen more, including five responding police officers.

Prosecutors focused on the shooter’s documented history of antisemitism throughout his trial and argued that it proved he had the requisite intent to kill. The defense unsuccessfully tried to argue that mental illness and delusional beliefs led to the massacre.

Survivors and family members of victims were in the courtroom to hear the verdict, which came after more than 10 hours of deliberations. The jurors agreed that Bowers planned his attack, committed a premeditated act, and selected targets that were vulnerable, elderly or disabled. They also agreed that there are aggravating factors such as the scope of the murders, lack of remorse and injury to surviving victims.

James Barber was executed for the beating death of Dorothy Epps in Alabama’s first lethal injection since difficulties inserting IVs led to a halt.

Using drugs that suppress breathing, James Barber, 64, was executed at an Alabama prison. He was convicted of beating Dorothy Epps, 75, to death with a claw hammer and fleeing with her purse in 2001.

The state resumed executions after governor Kay Ivey paused them in November to review procedures. Barber’s execution was the first since then.

He made a last statement and spoke with a spiritual adviser who was with him in the death chamber. Then he was given the lethal injection, which is the same one used in other states.

Across the country, majorities of adults support the death penalty for murderers. But opinions differ by party, education and race and ethnicity. For example, Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more likely to support the death penalty than Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents. Similarly, Whites are more likely to support it than Blacks. And people with less education are more likely to support it than those with a college degree or higher.

CBS News’ Scott MacFarlane has more.

Every day people around the world are sentenced to death for a wide range of crimes. Many are convicted after trials that fall short of international standards, including torture-tainted evidence and inadequate legal representation. Others languish on death row for years, not knowing when their last day will be.

CBS News’ Scott MacFarlane covers the justice system for all CBS News broadcasts and platforms. He has won multiple awards for his work, including a Wade H. McCree award for journalism about the justice system. His work on teacher licensing loopholes, child sexual abuse allegations and thoroughbred horse racing deaths has gained national attention. He has also investigated a congressional firestorm that resulted in the resignation of U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney. Prior to joining CBS News, he was a political and enterprise reporter for local TV stations in Cleveland and Detroit. He has also hosted a syndicated radio talk show. MacFarlane is a graduate of Syracuse University’s Newhouse School of Public Communications.

Push forward to learn more